
Keystone Law Group plc (KEYS.L)
ValueMarkers Composite Index
69% below intrinsic value ($19)
Keystone Law Group plc (KEYS.L) — VMCI valuation read
Keystone Law Group plc (KEYS.L) carries a VMCI composite of 57/100, 7 points above the Industrials sector median of 50. Among mid-cap names, that gap places KEYS.L in the top third on the five-pillar weighting (Value 35%, Quality 30%, Integrity 15%, Growth 12%, Risk 8%).
The KEYS.L insider tape has been silent for the past 30 days on Form 4. Where executives neither buy nor sell, the bull and bear cases lean harder on filings cadence and the next earnings line.
**Investor frame.** Value reads KEYS.L trades at 14.0x earnings, 22% below the Industrials median of 18.0x, which compresses or extends through the 11.0x EV/EBITDA versus a Industrials 12.0x. Quality: ROIC of 14.0% sits 4.0pp above the Industrials median (10.0%). Risk: net debt to EBITDA of -0.5x leaves covenant headroom, the line to track on Keystone Law Group plc's next 10-Q.
KEYS.L fell 1.9% over the trailing 7 days, with a +2.6% read on a 30-day basis.
Keystone Law Group plc, together with its subsidiaries, provides conventional legal services in the United Kingdom. The company offers its legal services in the areas of banking and finance, capital market, commercial, commercial property, construction and projects, corporate, data protection, dispute resolution, employment, EU and competition law, family and matrimonial, fraud and financial crime, immigration, insurance, intellectual property, investment funds and management, licensing and gambling, mediation and ADR, pensions and incentives, planning and environment, probate and estate planning, residential property, restructuring and insolvency, tax, and technology. It serves various sectors, such as aviation, charities and not for profit, energy and natural resources, education, financial service, food and beverage, high-net worth family office, hotels, hospitality and leisure, in-house counsel, life sciences and healthcare, marine and shipping, media, music, property development, retail, sports, and technology and telecoms, as well as private clients and professional practices. The company was founded in 2002 and is based in London, the United Kingdom.
Related Stocks in Industrials
Top peers ranked by VM Score. Compare valuation, quality, and risk metrics across the sector.
Browse More
Key metrics explained
Definitions, formulas, and how ValueMarkers calculates each indicator used in KEYS.L’s VM Score.
Explore More
Popular Stocks
- Apple (AAPL)Apple value analysis · VMCI score, DCF, MOS
- Microsoft (MSFT)Microsoft value analysis · 120 fundamental indicators
- Alphabet (GOOGL)Alphabet/Google value analysis
- Amazon (AMZN)Amazon intrinsic value and growth profile
- NVIDIA (NVDA)NVIDIA quality, growth, and risk analysis
- Meta Platforms (META)Meta value analysis · VMCI breakdown
- Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B)Berkshire quality + integrity breakdown
- Johnson & Johnson (JNJ)JNJ dividend quality analysis
- Visa (V)Visa moat, growth, and valuation
- JPMorgan Chase (JPM)JPM financials quality analysis
- Coca-Cola (KO)KO dividend king analysis
- Procter & Gamble (PG)PG dividend king fundamentals
Browse ETFs
- All ETFsTop 100 ETFs by AUM with VMCI-Composite scores
- SPY · S&P 500Broad-market ETF holdings analysis
- VOO · Vanguard S&P 500Low-cost S&P 500 exposure
- QQQ · Nasdaq 100Large-cap growth ETF analysis
- VTI · Total US MarketTotal US equity market ETF
- SCHD · Dividend ETFDividend-focused ETF holdings breakdown
- VYM · High Dividend YieldHigh-yield US dividend ETF
- DGRO · Dividend GrowthDividend growth ETF analysis
- XLK · Tech SectorTechnology sector ETF holdings
- VNQ · Real EstateUS REIT-focused ETF analysis
- GLD · GoldPhysical-gold-backed ETF
- ARKK · Disruptive InnovationThematic growth ETF holdings
Dividend Stocks
- All Dividend Stocks500+ dividend payers with safety scoring
- Dividend Kings50+ years of consecutive dividend growth
- Dividend Aristocrats25+ years of growth · S&P 500 members
- Dividend Contenders10-24 years of dividend growth
- Dividend Challengers5-9 years of dividend growth
- Safe-Yield DividendsQuality > 70 · low-risk dividend payers
- High-Yield DividendsStocks yielding 5%+ with payout health checks
- Dividend Growth10%+ five-year dividend CAGR
- Foreign DividendsNon-US dividend ADRs with VMCI scores
- Coca-Cola (KO) DividendKO dividend deep dive · DRIP projection
- JNJ Dividend AnalysisJohnson & Johnson dividend safety profile
- Procter & Gamble (PG) DividendPG dividend king status
Financial Glossary
- All Definitions120+ value-investing indicators explained
- Piotroski F-ScoreFinancial-strength signal 0-9
- Altman Z-ScoreBankruptcy-distress indicator
- Beneish M-ScoreEarnings-manipulation detection
- Margin of SafetyGraham's discount to intrinsic value
- DCF Intrinsic ValueDiscounted cash-flow valuation
- Graham NumberDefensive-investor fair-value formula
- P/E Ratio (TTM)Trailing price-to-earnings multiple
- EV/EBITDAEnterprise-value to EBITDA multiple
- FCF YieldFree-cash-flow per share / price
- ROICReturn on invested capital · quality signal
- ROIC-WACC SpreadEconomic profit signal
- WACCWeighted average cost of capital
- Dividend YieldAnnual dividend per share / price
- Owner EarningsBuffett's preferred cash-flow metric
Compare Competitors
- All ComparisonsCompare 67+ stock analysis tools
- vs GuruFocusDetailed feature and pricing comparison
- vs TIKRSide-by-side platform comparison
- vs MorningstarCompare analysis capabilities
- vs FinvizScreener comparison and review
- vs Seeking AlphaResearch platform comparison
- vs Simply Wall StVisual analysis comparison
- vs Yahoo FinanceFree tool comparison
- vs ZacksEarnings rank vs fundamental analysis
- vs StockopediaStockRanks vs DCF comparison
- vs Stock RoverPortfolio analytics comparison
- vs KoyfinTerminal-style tool comparison
- vs TradingViewCharting platform comparison
- vs Alpha SpreadValuation tool comparison
- vs WisesheetsExcel/Sheets add-in comparison
- vs MacroaxisData portal vs analysis platform
- vs Old School ValueGraham-style analysis comparison
- vs TIKR TerminalData terminal vs screener comparison