
Glenmark Life Sciences Limited (GLS.BO)
ValueMarkers Composite Index
DCF data not available
Glenmark Life Sciences Limited (GLS.BO) — VMCI valuation read
Composite valuation read on GLS.BO: VMCI 56/100 against a Healthcare sector median of 50. The 6-point above-median print is the headline number for Glenmark Life Sciences Limited, and at the mid-cap tier it reflects how the five pillars combine into a single decision-grade score.
Trailing 30-day insider activity for GLS.BO: nothing material on SEC EDGAR. With the Form 4 channel quiet, the price-vs-DCF gap and the trailing margin trend carry more weight in the active read.
**Investor frame.** Value, quality, risk in three lines on GLS.BO: GLS.BO trades at 19.0x earnings, 6% above the Healthcare median of 18.0x; ROIC of 9.0% trails the Healthcare median (10.0%) by 1.0pp; net debt to EBITDA of -0.4x leaves covenant headroom. EV/EBITDA at 14.0x versus 12.0x for Healthcare closes the value frame.
GLS.BO rose 2.3% over the trailing 7 days, with a -19.4% read on a 30-day basis.
Glenmark Life Sciences Limited engages in the development, manufacture, and supply of non-commoditized active pharmaceutical ingredients for various chronic therapeutic areas in India. It offers Olmesartan, Amiodarone, Telmisartan, Perindopril, Rosuvastatin, and Cilostazol for the treatment of cardiovascular disease; Oxcarbazepine, Zonisamide, Topiramate, Bupropion, Ropinirole, Riluzole, and Lacosamide for the treatment of central nervous system disease; Remogliflozin, Glimepiride, Teneligliptin, Vildagliptin, and Linagliptin for the treatment of diabetes; Etoricoxib, Lornoxicam, Zolmitriptan, and Frovatriptan for pain management; and Olaparib, Palbociclib, Enzalutamide, and Ruxolitinib for oncology treatment, as well as Atovaquone, an anti-parasitic and Adapalene, a dermatology product. The company also provides contract development and manufacturing services to a range of multinational pharmaceutical and specialty pharmaceutical companies. It also exports its products to Europe, North America, Latin America, Japan, and internationally. The company was incorporated in 2011 and is based in Mumbai, India. Glenmark Life Sciences Limited operates as a subsidiary of Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited.
Related Stocks in Healthcare
Top peers ranked by VM Score. Compare valuation, quality, and risk metrics across the sector.
Browse More
Key metrics explained
Definitions, formulas, and how ValueMarkers calculates each indicator used in GLS.BO’s VM Score.
Explore More
Popular Stocks
- Apple (AAPL)Apple value analysis · VMCI score, DCF, MOS
- Microsoft (MSFT)Microsoft value analysis · 120 fundamental indicators
- Alphabet (GOOGL)Alphabet/Google value analysis
- Amazon (AMZN)Amazon intrinsic value and growth profile
- NVIDIA (NVDA)NVIDIA quality, growth, and risk analysis
- Meta Platforms (META)Meta value analysis · VMCI breakdown
- Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B)Berkshire quality + integrity breakdown
- Johnson & Johnson (JNJ)JNJ dividend quality analysis
- Visa (V)Visa moat, growth, and valuation
- JPMorgan Chase (JPM)JPM financials quality analysis
- Coca-Cola (KO)KO dividend king analysis
- Procter & Gamble (PG)PG dividend king fundamentals
Browse ETFs
- All ETFsTop 100 ETFs by AUM with VMCI-Composite scores
- SPY · S&P 500Broad-market ETF holdings analysis
- VOO · Vanguard S&P 500Low-cost S&P 500 exposure
- QQQ · Nasdaq 100Large-cap growth ETF analysis
- VTI · Total US MarketTotal US equity market ETF
- SCHD · Dividend ETFDividend-focused ETF holdings breakdown
- VYM · High Dividend YieldHigh-yield US dividend ETF
- DGRO · Dividend GrowthDividend growth ETF analysis
- XLK · Tech SectorTechnology sector ETF holdings
- VNQ · Real EstateUS REIT-focused ETF analysis
- GLD · GoldPhysical-gold-backed ETF
- ARKK · Disruptive InnovationThematic growth ETF holdings
Dividend Stocks
- All Dividend Stocks500+ dividend payers with safety scoring
- Dividend Kings50+ years of consecutive dividend growth
- Dividend Aristocrats25+ years of growth · S&P 500 members
- Dividend Contenders10-24 years of dividend growth
- Dividend Challengers5-9 years of dividend growth
- Safe-Yield DividendsQuality > 70 · low-risk dividend payers
- High-Yield DividendsStocks yielding 5%+ with payout health checks
- Dividend Growth10%+ five-year dividend CAGR
- Foreign DividendsNon-US dividend ADRs with VMCI scores
- Coca-Cola (KO) DividendKO dividend deep dive · DRIP projection
- JNJ Dividend AnalysisJohnson & Johnson dividend safety profile
- Procter & Gamble (PG) DividendPG dividend king status
Financial Glossary
- All Definitions120+ value-investing indicators explained
- Piotroski F-ScoreFinancial-strength signal 0-9
- Altman Z-ScoreBankruptcy-distress indicator
- Beneish M-ScoreEarnings-manipulation detection
- Margin of SafetyGraham's discount to intrinsic value
- DCF Intrinsic ValueDiscounted cash-flow valuation
- Graham NumberDefensive-investor fair-value formula
- P/E Ratio (TTM)Trailing price-to-earnings multiple
- EV/EBITDAEnterprise-value to EBITDA multiple
- FCF YieldFree-cash-flow per share / price
- ROICReturn on invested capital · quality signal
- ROIC-WACC SpreadEconomic profit signal
- WACCWeighted average cost of capital
- Dividend YieldAnnual dividend per share / price
- Owner EarningsBuffett's preferred cash-flow metric
Compare Competitors
- All ComparisonsCompare 67+ stock analysis tools
- vs GuruFocusDetailed feature and pricing comparison
- vs TIKRSide-by-side platform comparison
- vs MorningstarCompare analysis capabilities
- vs FinvizScreener comparison and review
- vs Seeking AlphaResearch platform comparison
- vs Simply Wall StVisual analysis comparison
- vs Yahoo FinanceFree tool comparison
- vs ZacksEarnings rank vs fundamental analysis
- vs StockopediaStockRanks vs DCF comparison
- vs Stock RoverPortfolio analytics comparison
- vs KoyfinTerminal-style tool comparison
- vs TradingViewCharting platform comparison
- vs Alpha SpreadValuation tool comparison
- vs WisesheetsExcel/Sheets add-in comparison
- vs MacroaxisData portal vs analysis platform
- vs Old School ValueGraham-style analysis comparison
- vs TIKR TerminalData terminal vs screener comparison