Huadian Liaoning Energy Development Co., Ltd. Class A (600396.SS)
ValueMarkers Composite Index
494% above intrinsic value ($0)
Huadian Liaoning Energy Development Co., Ltd. Class A (600396.SS) — VMCI valuation read
600396.SS prints VMCI 36/100 inside the Utilities sector, where the median sits at 50. The 14-point below-median delta is the cleanest single-number summary of Huadian Liaoning Energy Development Co., Ltd. Class A's composite stance, and in the mid-cap bucket it places the share behind the typical peer on the five-pillar mix.
On 600396.SS, the SEC EDGAR Form 4 stream shows no insider buys or sells in the past 30 days. Quiet tapes happen; they just remove a signal that bull and bear cases sometimes lean on for confirmation.
**Investor frame.** 600396.SS trades at 24.0x earnings, 33% above the Utilities median of 18.0x; that is the value line. ROIC of 14.0% sits 4.0pp above the Utilities median (10.0%); that is the quality line. net debt to EBITDA of -1.0x leaves covenant headroom; that is the risk line for Huadian Liaoning Energy Development Co., Ltd. Class A on the trailing financials.
600396.SS rose 1.2% over the trailing 7 days, with a -15.0% read on a 30-day basis.
Huadian Liaoning Energy Development Co., Ltd. engages in the supply of thermoelectricity, wind power, and electric heating. It involves in the sales of fly ash, metal materials, maintenance of small power plant machines, furnaces, and electricity, comprehensive utilization of circulating water, technical services, hydropower, wind power and equipment installation. Its other activities include the provision of fishpond's drifts net services, supply of steam heat, distribution of metal materials and powdered coal and provision of small type electric generator, furnace, electric overhaul, car repair, and technical support services. The company was founded on June 4, 1998 and is headquartered in Shenyang, China.
Related Stocks in Utilities
Top peers ranked by VM Score. Compare valuation, quality, and risk metrics across the sector.
- CDUTF - Canadian Utilities Limited
- CDUTF - Canadian Utilities Limited
- 000601.SZ - GuangDong ShaoNeng Group Co., Ltd.
- CUTLF - Canadian Utilities Limited
- CUTLF - Canadian Utilities Limited
- 000966.SZ - CHN Energy Changyuan Electric Power Co., Ltd.
- 000993.SZ - Fujian Mindong Electric Power Limited Company
- DNNGY - Ørsted A/S
Browse More
Key metrics explained
Definitions, formulas, and how ValueMarkers calculates each indicator used in 600396.SS’s VM Score.
Explore More
Popular Stocks
- Apple (AAPL)Apple value analysis · VMCI score, DCF, MOS
- Microsoft (MSFT)Microsoft value analysis · 120 fundamental indicators
- Alphabet (GOOGL)Alphabet/Google value analysis
- Amazon (AMZN)Amazon intrinsic value and growth profile
- NVIDIA (NVDA)NVIDIA quality, growth, and risk analysis
- Meta Platforms (META)Meta value analysis · VMCI breakdown
- Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B)Berkshire quality + integrity breakdown
- Johnson & Johnson (JNJ)JNJ dividend quality analysis
- Visa (V)Visa moat, growth, and valuation
- JPMorgan Chase (JPM)JPM financials quality analysis
- Coca-Cola (KO)KO dividend king analysis
- Procter & Gamble (PG)PG dividend king fundamentals
Browse ETFs
- All ETFsTop 100 ETFs by AUM with VMCI-Composite scores
- SPY · S&P 500Broad-market ETF holdings analysis
- VOO · Vanguard S&P 500Low-cost S&P 500 exposure
- QQQ · Nasdaq 100Large-cap growth ETF analysis
- VTI · Total US MarketTotal US equity market ETF
- SCHD · Dividend ETFDividend-focused ETF holdings breakdown
- VYM · High Dividend YieldHigh-yield US dividend ETF
- DGRO · Dividend GrowthDividend growth ETF analysis
- XLK · Tech SectorTechnology sector ETF holdings
- VNQ · Real EstateUS REIT-focused ETF analysis
- GLD · GoldPhysical-gold-backed ETF
- ARKK · Disruptive InnovationThematic growth ETF holdings
Dividend Stocks
- All Dividend Stocks500+ dividend payers with safety scoring
- Dividend Kings50+ years of consecutive dividend growth
- Dividend Aristocrats25+ years of growth · S&P 500 members
- Dividend Contenders10-24 years of dividend growth
- Dividend Challengers5-9 years of dividend growth
- Safe-Yield DividendsQuality > 70 · low-risk dividend payers
- High-Yield DividendsStocks yielding 5%+ with payout health checks
- Dividend Growth10%+ five-year dividend CAGR
- Foreign DividendsNon-US dividend ADRs with VMCI scores
- Coca-Cola (KO) DividendKO dividend deep dive · DRIP projection
- JNJ Dividend AnalysisJohnson & Johnson dividend safety profile
- Procter & Gamble (PG) DividendPG dividend king status
Financial Glossary
- All Definitions120+ value-investing indicators explained
- Piotroski F-ScoreFinancial-strength signal 0-9
- Altman Z-ScoreBankruptcy-distress indicator
- Beneish M-ScoreEarnings-manipulation detection
- Margin of SafetyGraham's discount to intrinsic value
- DCF Intrinsic ValueDiscounted cash-flow valuation
- Graham NumberDefensive-investor fair-value formula
- P/E Ratio (TTM)Trailing price-to-earnings multiple
- EV/EBITDAEnterprise-value to EBITDA multiple
- FCF YieldFree-cash-flow per share / price
- ROICReturn on invested capital · quality signal
- ROIC-WACC SpreadEconomic profit signal
- WACCWeighted average cost of capital
- Dividend YieldAnnual dividend per share / price
- Owner EarningsBuffett's preferred cash-flow metric
Compare Competitors
- All ComparisonsCompare 67+ stock analysis tools
- vs GuruFocusDetailed feature and pricing comparison
- vs TIKRSide-by-side platform comparison
- vs MorningstarCompare analysis capabilities
- vs FinvizScreener comparison and review
- vs Seeking AlphaResearch platform comparison
- vs Simply Wall StVisual analysis comparison
- vs Yahoo FinanceFree tool comparison
- vs ZacksEarnings rank vs fundamental analysis
- vs StockopediaStockRanks vs DCF comparison
- vs Stock RoverPortfolio analytics comparison
- vs KoyfinTerminal-style tool comparison
- vs TradingViewCharting platform comparison
- vs Alpha SpreadValuation tool comparison
- vs WisesheetsExcel/Sheets add-in comparison
- vs MacroaxisData portal vs analysis platform
- vs Old School ValueGraham-style analysis comparison
- vs TIKR TerminalData terminal vs screener comparison