
YG Plus, Inc. (037270.KS)
ValueMarkers Composite Index
50% below intrinsic value ($7)
YG Plus, Inc. (037270.KS) — VMCI valuation read
Headline read on 037270.KS: VMCI of 59/100 versus a Communication Services sector median of 50. The 9-point above-median position is what makes YG Plus, Inc. a relative-value candidate in the mid-cap cohort, before any pillar-level review.
Form 4 filings on 037270.KS: zero in the trailing 30 days. The absence of insider transactions is itself a data point, just a low-information one. The thesis runs on financials and price action until that changes.
**Investor frame.** Three reads on 037270.KS: value (037270.KS trades at 19.0x earnings, 6% above the Communication Services median of 18.0x), quality (ROIC of 15.0% sits 5.0pp above the Communication Services median (10.0%)), and risk (net debt to EBITDA of -1.6x leaves covenant headroom). The value read also implies an EV/EBITDA gap of +4.0x against the Communication Services 12.0x baseline.
037270.KS rose 0.8% over the trailing 7 days, with a -19.1% read on a 30-day basis.
YG Plus, Inc. operates as an entertaining content and lifestyle company. It also operates NAVER music platform; VIBE, a music/record investment distribution agency; and contents sourcing agency. In addition, the company engages in the merchandise production, distribution, and licensing of artists and characters; and PPL and digital contents advertising agency business of artists. Further, it is involved in the cosmetics business under the moonshot brand; golf player management, golf tournament planning and operation, golf clothing distribution, online platform, and golf simulator sales business; and event planning and production, model management and academy, brand PR and marketing business, as well as financial investment business. The company was formerly known as Phoenix Holdings Inc. The company is based in Seoul, South Korea.
Related Stocks in Communication Services
Top peers ranked by VM Score. Compare valuation, quality, and risk metrics across the sector.
- BCOMF - B Communications Ltd
- BCOMF - B Communications Ltd
- CUCSY - China Communications Services Corporation Limited
- CUCSF - China Communications Services Corporation Limited
- ROUTE.NS - Route Mobile Limited
- ROUTE.BO - Route Mobile Limited
- 214320.KS - Innocean Worldwide Inc.
- TRKNY - Türk Telekomünikasyon Anonim Sirketi
Browse More
Key metrics explained
Definitions, formulas, and how ValueMarkers calculates each indicator used in 037270.KS’s VM Score.
Explore More
Popular Stocks
- Apple (AAPL)Apple value analysis · VMCI score, DCF, MOS
- Microsoft (MSFT)Microsoft value analysis · 120 fundamental indicators
- Alphabet (GOOGL)Alphabet/Google value analysis
- Amazon (AMZN)Amazon intrinsic value and growth profile
- NVIDIA (NVDA)NVIDIA quality, growth, and risk analysis
- Meta Platforms (META)Meta value analysis · VMCI breakdown
- Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B)Berkshire quality + integrity breakdown
- Johnson & Johnson (JNJ)JNJ dividend quality analysis
- Visa (V)Visa moat, growth, and valuation
- JPMorgan Chase (JPM)JPM financials quality analysis
- Coca-Cola (KO)KO dividend king analysis
- Procter & Gamble (PG)PG dividend king fundamentals
Browse ETFs
- All ETFsTop 100 ETFs by AUM with VMCI-Composite scores
- SPY · S&P 500Broad-market ETF holdings analysis
- VOO · Vanguard S&P 500Low-cost S&P 500 exposure
- QQQ · Nasdaq 100Large-cap growth ETF analysis
- VTI · Total US MarketTotal US equity market ETF
- SCHD · Dividend ETFDividend-focused ETF holdings breakdown
- VYM · High Dividend YieldHigh-yield US dividend ETF
- DGRO · Dividend GrowthDividend growth ETF analysis
- XLK · Tech SectorTechnology sector ETF holdings
- VNQ · Real EstateUS REIT-focused ETF analysis
- GLD · GoldPhysical-gold-backed ETF
- ARKK · Disruptive InnovationThematic growth ETF holdings
Dividend Stocks
- All Dividend Stocks500+ dividend payers with safety scoring
- Dividend Kings50+ years of consecutive dividend growth
- Dividend Aristocrats25+ years of growth · S&P 500 members
- Dividend Contenders10-24 years of dividend growth
- Dividend Challengers5-9 years of dividend growth
- Safe-Yield DividendsQuality > 70 · low-risk dividend payers
- High-Yield DividendsStocks yielding 5%+ with payout health checks
- Dividend Growth10%+ five-year dividend CAGR
- Foreign DividendsNon-US dividend ADRs with VMCI scores
- Coca-Cola (KO) DividendKO dividend deep dive · DRIP projection
- JNJ Dividend AnalysisJohnson & Johnson dividend safety profile
- Procter & Gamble (PG) DividendPG dividend king status
Financial Glossary
- All Definitions120+ value-investing indicators explained
- Piotroski F-ScoreFinancial-strength signal 0-9
- Altman Z-ScoreBankruptcy-distress indicator
- Beneish M-ScoreEarnings-manipulation detection
- Margin of SafetyGraham's discount to intrinsic value
- DCF Intrinsic ValueDiscounted cash-flow valuation
- Graham NumberDefensive-investor fair-value formula
- P/E Ratio (TTM)Trailing price-to-earnings multiple
- EV/EBITDAEnterprise-value to EBITDA multiple
- FCF YieldFree-cash-flow per share / price
- ROICReturn on invested capital · quality signal
- ROIC-WACC SpreadEconomic profit signal
- WACCWeighted average cost of capital
- Dividend YieldAnnual dividend per share / price
- Owner EarningsBuffett's preferred cash-flow metric
Compare Competitors
- All ComparisonsCompare 67+ stock analysis tools
- vs GuruFocusDetailed feature and pricing comparison
- vs TIKRSide-by-side platform comparison
- vs MorningstarCompare analysis capabilities
- vs FinvizScreener comparison and review
- vs Seeking AlphaResearch platform comparison
- vs Simply Wall StVisual analysis comparison
- vs Yahoo FinanceFree tool comparison
- vs ZacksEarnings rank vs fundamental analysis
- vs StockopediaStockRanks vs DCF comparison
- vs Stock RoverPortfolio analytics comparison
- vs KoyfinTerminal-style tool comparison
- vs TradingViewCharting platform comparison
- vs Alpha SpreadValuation tool comparison
- vs WisesheetsExcel/Sheets add-in comparison
- vs MacroaxisData portal vs analysis platform
- vs Old School ValueGraham-style analysis comparison
- vs TIKR TerminalData terminal vs screener comparison