
Daewon Kang Up Co., Ltd. (000430.KS)
ValueMarkers Composite Index
59% below intrinsic value ($6)
Daewon Kang Up Co., Ltd. (000430.KS) — VMCI valuation read
The headline on Daewon Kang Up Co., Ltd. (000430.KS) is a 60/100 VMCI score, set against a broad-market sample median of 50. That 10-point above-median read reflects the five-pillar weighting and, for a mid-cap name, suggests a relative-value tailwind is in the data.
000430.KS insider activity report: 0 buys, 0 sells filed via Form 4 over the past 30 days. The next datable items are the 10-Q schedule and any 8-K-triggering events; both feed the VMCI Integrity pillar more than the price tape.
**Investor frame.** 000430.KS trades at 21.0x earnings, 17% above the sector median of 18.0x sets the value side. ROIC of 15.0% sits 5.0pp above the sector median (10.0%) sets the quality side. Net debt to EBITDA of -1.7x leaves covenant headroom sets the risk side, the three lines a value buyer reads first on 000430.KS.
000430.KS fell 1.6% over the trailing 7 days, with a -16.0% read on a 30-day basis.
Daewon Kang Up Co., Ltd. develops, produces, and sells suspension springs and seats in South Korea and internationally. The company offers suspension springs, including coil and leaf springs, stabilizer and torsion bars, and air springs, as well as air and pusher axle suspension kits for automobile makers; and coil insert, tension bar connection, and test equipment for springs. It also provides precision springs, such as engine valve springs and cotters, curved springs, return springs, die springs, and precision wire and disc springs, as well as flat and snap rings, and IT components for use in auto parts, electronic products, industrial machinery, civil construction parts, and high precision IT parts. In addition, the company offers seats for automobiles, subway trains, trains, heavy equipment, and other industries; manufacturing equipment for coil and leaf springs, and stabilizer bars; peelers, testing equipment for springs, and engineering services; equipment for materials processing and engineering services; and adjusters, recliners, pumping devices, headrests, magnesium frames, and set assemblies. The company was founded in 1946 and is headquartered in Cheonan-si, South Korea.
Related Stocks
Top peers ranked by VM Score. Compare valuation, quality, and risk metrics across the sector.
Browse More
Key metrics explained
Definitions, formulas, and how ValueMarkers calculates each indicator used in 000430.KS’s VM Score.
Explore More
Popular Stocks
- Apple (AAPL)Apple value analysis · VMCI score, DCF, MOS
- Microsoft (MSFT)Microsoft value analysis · 120 fundamental indicators
- Alphabet (GOOGL)Alphabet/Google value analysis
- Amazon (AMZN)Amazon intrinsic value and growth profile
- NVIDIA (NVDA)NVIDIA quality, growth, and risk analysis
- Meta Platforms (META)Meta value analysis · VMCI breakdown
- Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B)Berkshire quality + integrity breakdown
- Johnson & Johnson (JNJ)JNJ dividend quality analysis
- Visa (V)Visa moat, growth, and valuation
- JPMorgan Chase (JPM)JPM financials quality analysis
- Coca-Cola (KO)KO dividend king analysis
- Procter & Gamble (PG)PG dividend king fundamentals
Browse ETFs
- All ETFsTop 100 ETFs by AUM with VMCI-Composite scores
- SPY · S&P 500Broad-market ETF holdings analysis
- VOO · Vanguard S&P 500Low-cost S&P 500 exposure
- QQQ · Nasdaq 100Large-cap growth ETF analysis
- VTI · Total US MarketTotal US equity market ETF
- SCHD · Dividend ETFDividend-focused ETF holdings breakdown
- VYM · High Dividend YieldHigh-yield US dividend ETF
- DGRO · Dividend GrowthDividend growth ETF analysis
- XLK · Tech SectorTechnology sector ETF holdings
- VNQ · Real EstateUS REIT-focused ETF analysis
- GLD · GoldPhysical-gold-backed ETF
- ARKK · Disruptive InnovationThematic growth ETF holdings
Dividend Stocks
- All Dividend Stocks500+ dividend payers with safety scoring
- Dividend Kings50+ years of consecutive dividend growth
- Dividend Aristocrats25+ years of growth · S&P 500 members
- Dividend Contenders10-24 years of dividend growth
- Dividend Challengers5-9 years of dividend growth
- Safe-Yield DividendsQuality > 70 · low-risk dividend payers
- High-Yield DividendsStocks yielding 5%+ with payout health checks
- Dividend Growth10%+ five-year dividend CAGR
- Foreign DividendsNon-US dividend ADRs with VMCI scores
- Coca-Cola (KO) DividendKO dividend deep dive · DRIP projection
- JNJ Dividend AnalysisJohnson & Johnson dividend safety profile
- Procter & Gamble (PG) DividendPG dividend king status
Financial Glossary
- All Definitions120+ value-investing indicators explained
- Piotroski F-ScoreFinancial-strength signal 0-9
- Altman Z-ScoreBankruptcy-distress indicator
- Beneish M-ScoreEarnings-manipulation detection
- Margin of SafetyGraham's discount to intrinsic value
- DCF Intrinsic ValueDiscounted cash-flow valuation
- Graham NumberDefensive-investor fair-value formula
- P/E Ratio (TTM)Trailing price-to-earnings multiple
- EV/EBITDAEnterprise-value to EBITDA multiple
- FCF YieldFree-cash-flow per share / price
- ROICReturn on invested capital · quality signal
- ROIC-WACC SpreadEconomic profit signal
- WACCWeighted average cost of capital
- Dividend YieldAnnual dividend per share / price
- Owner EarningsBuffett's preferred cash-flow metric
Compare Competitors
- All ComparisonsCompare 67+ stock analysis tools
- vs GuruFocusDetailed feature and pricing comparison
- vs TIKRSide-by-side platform comparison
- vs MorningstarCompare analysis capabilities
- vs FinvizScreener comparison and review
- vs Seeking AlphaResearch platform comparison
- vs Simply Wall StVisual analysis comparison
- vs Yahoo FinanceFree tool comparison
- vs ZacksEarnings rank vs fundamental analysis
- vs StockopediaStockRanks vs DCF comparison
- vs Stock RoverPortfolio analytics comparison
- vs KoyfinTerminal-style tool comparison
- vs TradingViewCharting platform comparison
- vs Alpha SpreadValuation tool comparison
- vs WisesheetsExcel/Sheets add-in comparison
- vs MacroaxisData portal vs analysis platform
- vs Old School ValueGraham-style analysis comparison
- vs TIKR TerminalData terminal vs screener comparison