Skip to main content
Stock Analysis

Gordon Growth Model: Formula and Calculator

Javier Sanz, Founder & Lead Analyst at ValueMarkers
By , Founder & Lead AnalystEditorially reviewed
Last updated: Reviewed by: Javier Sanz
3 min read
Share:

Gordon Growth Model: Formula and Calculator

gordon growth model — chart and analysis

The Gordon Growth Model GGM is a method used to find the fair value of a stock based on future dividends that grows at a constant growth rate. As a form of dividend discount model DDM, the Gordon Growth Model assumes that a company will keep paying dividend payments that rise at a steady growth pace forever. Understanding the Gordon Growth Model formula starts with three inputs: the expected dividend per share for next year, the required rate of return that investors demand, and the expected dividend growth rate. The formula divides next year's dividend per share by the gap between the required rate of return and the constant growth rate to produce a fair stock value.

To see how the model works, consider a stock with a two dollar dividend per share that has a growth rate of dividends at four percent per year. If the required returns for this stock equal ten percent, the Gordon Growth Model values it at about thirty-three dollars. When market prices fall below this figure, the stock looks cheap and may offer a good buying chance. When market prices sit above the calculated value, the stock may be too expensive. This simple comparison between model output and market prices helps investors spot deals in the dividend-paying space.

The cost of equity serves as the discount rate in the Gordon Growth Model and plays a central role in the result. Analysts often derive the cost of equity from the Capital Asset Pricing Model, which adds a risk premium to the risk-free rate based on how much the stock moves with the broader market. Small shifts in growth rates discount rates can change the output by large amounts, so getting both inputs right matters a great deal. The relationship between growth rates discount rates must always show the required returns exceeding the growth rate, or the formula breaks down and gives a negative or infinite result.

Despite its clean design, the limitations of the Gordon Growth model are worth noting. The model only works for firms that pay regular dividend payments and show steady growth patterns. Companies in fast-changing sectors rarely grows at a constant rate, which means the model may not reflect their true worth. High-growth firms that reinvest all profits instead of paying dividends fall outside its scope entirely. For these cases, a discounted cash flow approach using projected future dividends across multiple stages may produce better results than the single-stage Gordon Growth Model.

Value investors still rely on the Gordon Growth Model as a quick screen for dividend stocks trading at fair or below-fair prices. Pairing it with other tools like discounted cash flow models and relative valuation methods gives a fuller picture of what a stock should be worth. The required rate of return and expected dividend growth rate remain the two most important inputs, and even small errors in these figures can lead to large swings in the final value. Careful research into a company s payout history and future earnings potential helps ensure the model gives useful results for long term investment choices.

How to Apply This in Practice

Turning theory into a repeatable workflow is where most investors get stuck. Here is a step-by-step approach that keeps the process disciplined.

  1. Start with the screener and filter for stocks that meet your basic quality thresholds across the 120+ indicators ValueMarkers tracks.
  2. Pull the last three to five years of financials for each candidate. Trends matter more than any single data point.
  3. Benchmark against two or three peers in the same industry. Absolute numbers mean little without a reference point.
  4. Cross-check the result with an independent lens, such as a DCF valuation or the 5-pillar score on the leaderboard.
  5. Document your thesis in writing before you act. If you cannot defend the position on paper, the conviction is likely not there yet.

Comparison to Alternative Approaches

No single tool covers every scenario, so it helps to know what else is available.

Relative valuation multiples such as P/E, P/B, and EV/EBITDA are quick to compute and easy to benchmark against peers. They work well for screening but miss business-specific nuance. Discounted cash flow is more thorough but requires explicit assumptions about growth and discount rates. Run both on the DCF calculator to see how sensitive the fair value is to those inputs.

Quality screens such as the Piotroski F-Score and Altman Z-Score filter for balance sheet strength rather than cheapness. Pair a valuation approach with a quality check and the false-positive rate drops meaningfully.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

A few pitfalls repeat across every investor who works with gordon growth model.

  • Treating one indicator as a verdict. A single ratio never tells the full story. Pair it with context from the methodology and other pillars.
  • Using stale data. Financials from two years ago can distort conclusions. Always work from recent filings.
  • Ignoring the industry baseline. Acceptable ranges differ across sectors, so compare within a peer group rather than a broad index.
  • Skipping the quality check. Weak earnings quality can make an otherwise attractive number misleading. Run a Piotroski and Altman review alongside it.
  • Confusing a low figure with a bargain. Sometimes the market is pricing in real deterioration. Confirm the thesis before acting.

Key Limitations

Honesty is the price of admission for any serious framework. Gordon growth model comes with real caveats.

  • Accounting choices shape the inputs. Two firms can report similar headline numbers while applying different assumptions underneath.
  • Past performance does not guarantee future results. The signal is descriptive, not predictive.
  • Industry distortions are common. Financial firms, insurers, REITs, and utilities often need specialized treatment.
  • One-off events can flatter or punish the figure. A divestiture, impairment, or tax adjustment can reshape the picture for a single period.
  • Sentiment and macro conditions are outside the model. Interest rates, credit cycles, and capital flows can override fundamentals for long stretches.

Further reading: SEC EDGAR · FRED Economic Data

Why gordon growth Matters

This section anchors the discussion on gordon growth. The detailed treatment, formula, and worked examples appear in the body of this article above. The points below summarize the most important takeaways for value investors who want to apply gordon growth in real portfolio decisions. ValueMarkers exposes the underlying data on every covered ticker via the screener and stock profile pages, so the concepts in this article translate directly into actionable filters.

Key inputs for gordon growth

See the main discussion of gordon growth in the sections above for the full treatment, including the inputs, the calculation methodology, the typical sector benchmarks, and the most common pitfalls to avoid. The ValueMarkers screener lets value investors filter the full universe of 100,000+ stocks across 73 exchanges using gordon growth alongside the rest of the 120-indicator composite, with sector percentiles and historical trends shown on every stock profile.

Sector benchmarks for gordon growth

See the main discussion of gordon growth in the sections above for the full treatment, including the inputs, the calculation methodology, the typical sector benchmarks, and the most common pitfalls to avoid. The ValueMarkers screener lets value investors filter the full universe of 100,000+ stocks across 73 exchanges using gordon growth alongside the rest of the 120-indicator composite, with sector percentiles and historical trends shown on every stock profile.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the fair value of Gordon Growth Model stock?

The fair value of Gordon Growth Model depends on the valuation model used. Discounted cash flow analysis, earnings multiples, and asset-based approaches each produce different estimates. ValueMarkers calculates intrinsic value using multiple models so investors can compare results and form their own view on whether Gordon Growth Model is priced fairly.

Is Gordon Growth Model overvalued or undervalued right now?

Whether Gordon Growth Model is overvalued or undervalued depends on future earnings growth and the discount rate applied to those cash flows. Comparing the current stock price to calculated fair value estimates provides a starting point. Investors should also consider the company's competitive position, margin trends, and capital allocation before drawing conclusions.

What are the key risks for Gordon Growth Model investors?

Key risks for Gordon Growth Model include competitive pressures, regulatory changes, and macroeconomic headwinds that could affect revenue growth or profit margins. Company-specific factors such as management execution, debt levels, and capital expenditure plans also influence the investment outlook. Reviewing the Altman Z-Score and Piotroski F-Score can help quantify financial health and earnings quality.

What is Gordon Growth Model's competitive advantage?

A durable competitive advantage, or economic moat, protects a company's market share and pricing power over time. Factors like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and cost advantages all contribute to moat durability. Analyzing return on invested capital (ROIC) trends over 5 to 10 years helps reveal whether Gordon Growth Model's competitive position is strengthening or weakening.

How does Gordon Growth Model compare to its peers?

Peer comparison involves reviewing valuation multiples like P/E, P/B, and EV/EBITDA alongside profitability metrics like ROE and ROIC. Stocks that trade at lower multiples with similar or better quality scores may represent better value. ValueMarkers lets investors screen and compare stocks across 120 indicators to identify relative value within any sector.

Where can I find reliable gordon growth model data?

Reliable stock analysis data comes from platforms that pull directly from SEC filings and audited financial statements. ValueMarkers provides over 120 fundamental indicators, DCF valuation models, and quality scores for more than 100,000 stocks across 73 global exchanges. All data points link back to their source calculations so investors can verify the numbers themselves.


Ready to find your next value investment?

ValueMarkers tracks 120+ fundamental indicators across 100,000+ stocks on 73 global exchanges. Run the methodology above in seconds with our stock screener, or see today's top-ranked names on the leaderboard.

Related tools: DCF Calculator · Methodology · Compare ValueMarkers

Disclaimer: This content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Explore More

Investing Tools

Compare Competitors

Browse Stocks

Weekly Stock Analysis - Free

5 undervalued stocks, fully modeled. Every Monday. No spam.

Cookie Preferences

We use cookies to analyze site usage and improve your experience. You can accept all, reject all, or customize your preferences.