
Shenzhen Microgate Technology Co., Ltd. (300319.SZ)
ValueMarkers Composite Index
DCF data not available
Shenzhen Microgate Technology Co., Ltd. (300319.SZ) — VMCI valuation read
Composite valuation read on 300319.SZ: VMCI 50/100 against a Technology sector median of 50. The 0-point below-median print is the headline number for Shenzhen Microgate Technology Co., Ltd., and at the mid-cap tier it reflects how the five pillars combine into a single decision-grade score.
Trailing 30-day insider activity for 300319.SZ: nothing material on SEC EDGAR. With the Form 4 channel quiet, the price-vs-DCF gap and the trailing margin trend carry more weight in the active read.
**Investor frame.** Value, quality, risk in three lines on 300319.SZ: 300319.SZ trades at 23.0x earnings, 28% above the Technology median of 18.0x; ROIC of 17.0% sits 7.0pp above the Technology median (10.0%); net debt to EBITDA of -1.1x leaves covenant headroom. EV/EBITDA at 14.0x versus 12.0x for Technology closes the value frame.
300319.SZ fell 0.6% over the trailing 7 days, with a -6.5% read on a 30-day basis.
Shenzhen Microgate Technology Co., Ltd. operates in the multilayer passive component industry worldwide. The company engages in the research, development, manufacture, and sale of LTCC RF components, chip inductors, EMI/EMC components, power inductors, and NFC antennas, as well as chip circuit protect and coil components, molding products, wirewound power inductors, SAW filters and duplexers, and chip EMC components. Its products are used in DVD players, mobile phones, personal computers, flat panel displays, car carriers, MP3s and MP4s, GPS systems, and other consumptive manufactures, as well as wireless, digital product, LCD/LED TV and monitor, and other applications. The company was founded in 2001 and is headquartered in Shenzhen, China.
Related Stocks in Technology
Top peers ranked by VM Score. Compare valuation, quality, and risk metrics across the sector.
- CAMS.NS - Computer Age Management Services Limited
- 060250.KQ - NHN KCP Corp.
- CAMS.BO - Computer Age Management Services Limited
- BYDIY - BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited
- 603444.SS - G-bits Network Technology (Xiamen) Co., Ltd.
- BYDIY - BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited
- BYDIF - BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited
- BYDIF - BYD Electronic (International) Company Limited
Browse More
Key metrics explained
Definitions, formulas, and how ValueMarkers calculates each indicator used in 300319.SZ’s VM Score.
Explore More
Popular Stocks
- Apple (AAPL)Apple value analysis · VMCI score, DCF, MOS
- Microsoft (MSFT)Microsoft value analysis · 120 fundamental indicators
- Alphabet (GOOGL)Alphabet/Google value analysis
- Amazon (AMZN)Amazon intrinsic value and growth profile
- NVIDIA (NVDA)NVIDIA quality, growth, and risk analysis
- Meta Platforms (META)Meta value analysis · VMCI breakdown
- Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B)Berkshire quality + integrity breakdown
- Johnson & Johnson (JNJ)JNJ dividend quality analysis
- Visa (V)Visa moat, growth, and valuation
- JPMorgan Chase (JPM)JPM financials quality analysis
- Coca-Cola (KO)KO dividend king analysis
- Procter & Gamble (PG)PG dividend king fundamentals
Browse ETFs
- All ETFsTop 100 ETFs by AUM with VMCI-Composite scores
- SPY · S&P 500Broad-market ETF holdings analysis
- VOO · Vanguard S&P 500Low-cost S&P 500 exposure
- QQQ · Nasdaq 100Large-cap growth ETF analysis
- VTI · Total US MarketTotal US equity market ETF
- SCHD · Dividend ETFDividend-focused ETF holdings breakdown
- VYM · High Dividend YieldHigh-yield US dividend ETF
- DGRO · Dividend GrowthDividend growth ETF analysis
- XLK · Tech SectorTechnology sector ETF holdings
- VNQ · Real EstateUS REIT-focused ETF analysis
- GLD · GoldPhysical-gold-backed ETF
- ARKK · Disruptive InnovationThematic growth ETF holdings
Dividend Stocks
- All Dividend Stocks500+ dividend payers with safety scoring
- Dividend Kings50+ years of consecutive dividend growth
- Dividend Aristocrats25+ years of growth · S&P 500 members
- Dividend Contenders10-24 years of dividend growth
- Dividend Challengers5-9 years of dividend growth
- Safe-Yield DividendsQuality > 70 · low-risk dividend payers
- High-Yield DividendsStocks yielding 5%+ with payout health checks
- Dividend Growth10%+ five-year dividend CAGR
- Foreign DividendsNon-US dividend ADRs with VMCI scores
- Coca-Cola (KO) DividendKO dividend deep dive · DRIP projection
- JNJ Dividend AnalysisJohnson & Johnson dividend safety profile
- Procter & Gamble (PG) DividendPG dividend king status
Financial Glossary
- All Definitions120+ value-investing indicators explained
- Piotroski F-ScoreFinancial-strength signal 0-9
- Altman Z-ScoreBankruptcy-distress indicator
- Beneish M-ScoreEarnings-manipulation detection
- Margin of SafetyGraham's discount to intrinsic value
- DCF Intrinsic ValueDiscounted cash-flow valuation
- Graham NumberDefensive-investor fair-value formula
- P/E Ratio (TTM)Trailing price-to-earnings multiple
- EV/EBITDAEnterprise-value to EBITDA multiple
- FCF YieldFree-cash-flow per share / price
- ROICReturn on invested capital · quality signal
- ROIC-WACC SpreadEconomic profit signal
- WACCWeighted average cost of capital
- Dividend YieldAnnual dividend per share / price
- Owner EarningsBuffett's preferred cash-flow metric
Compare Competitors
- All ComparisonsCompare 67+ stock analysis tools
- vs GuruFocusDetailed feature and pricing comparison
- vs TIKRSide-by-side platform comparison
- vs MorningstarCompare analysis capabilities
- vs FinvizScreener comparison and review
- vs Seeking AlphaResearch platform comparison
- vs Simply Wall StVisual analysis comparison
- vs Yahoo FinanceFree tool comparison
- vs ZacksEarnings rank vs fundamental analysis
- vs StockopediaStockRanks vs DCF comparison
- vs Stock RoverPortfolio analytics comparison
- vs KoyfinTerminal-style tool comparison
- vs TradingViewCharting platform comparison
- vs Alpha SpreadValuation tool comparison
- vs WisesheetsExcel/Sheets add-in comparison
- vs MacroaxisData portal vs analysis platform
- vs Old School ValueGraham-style analysis comparison
- vs TIKR TerminalData terminal vs screener comparison